Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 00:42:18 -0700 From: "Crist J . Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net> To: "Eric P. Scott" <eps@sirius.com> Cc: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NO_TCSH issue Message-ID: <20000908004218.L69158@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> In-Reply-To: <200009080254.TAA52210@mail1.sirius.com>; from eps@sirius.com on Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:54:17PM -0700 References: <200009080254.TAA52210@mail1.sirius.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:54:17PM -0700, Eric P. Scott wrote: [snip] > What individuals choose as defaults for their personal accounts > is their business. I don't see a problem with having sh, ksh, > zsh, bash, csh, tcsh, _whatever_ available. But I stand by my > opinion that replacing csh with tcsh in 4.1-RELEASE was the > single most ill-conceived action taken by the committers. How many times does it have to be said? The old "csh" in pre-4.0 FreeBSD was actually a stripped down implementation of tcsh. The old "csh" in FreeBSD was not replaced with tcsh. Rather, the old reduced-feature tcsh in pre-4.0 FreeBSD was restored to a fully functional tcsh. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000908004218.L69158>