Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 20:46:22 +0200 From: Phil Regnauld <regnauld@ftf.net> To: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Known MMAP() race conditions ... ? Message-ID: <19990714204622.17443@ns.int.ftf.net> In-Reply-To: <000001bece26$72d03780$021d85d1@youwant.to>; from David Schwartz on Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 11:26:54AM -0700 References: <19990714203806.46887@ns.int.ftf.net> <000001bece26$72d03780$021d85d1@youwant.to>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Schwartz writes: > > > > Doesn't beat other LFSes. And what is it good at ? > > Integrity ? Fragmentation (hah!) > > Performance ? > > Agreed. The question was not "what does NT do better than every UNIX". It > was "what does NT do better than any UNIX". One other nice thing about NTFS And again, XFS exists for UNIX, Softupdates will soon allow no-fsck operation... > (although certainly not unique) is that you can defragement it while it's > operating. FFS is even better: it doesn't fragment. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990714204622.17443>