Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:13:15 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Cc: "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r258908 - head/sbin/route Message-ID: <CAF6rxgm8u%2B1sEWWt7Fhi6pRZyoXD1y_SQxnrfLWZDwFo=BoYgw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20131204051726.GD48919@FreeBSD.org> References: <201312040506.rB456u6r058512@svn.freebsd.org> <20131204051726.GD48919@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 05:06:56AM +0000, Eitan Adler wrote: > E> Author: eadler > E> Date: Wed Dec 4 05:06:56 2013 > E> New Revision: 258908 > E> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/258908 > E> > E> Log: > E> Avoid using a static buffer in atalk_ntoa. This will help allow users to call route(1) as a library. > E> > E> Submitted by: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de> (older version) > E> Discussed on: -hackers > E> Reviwed by: adri (different older version) > > Does this mean someone is still using atalk? No, it is part of a larger series of changes which will eventually allow route(1) to be statically linked into a larger program. -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgm8u%2B1sEWWt7Fhi6pRZyoXD1y_SQxnrfLWZDwFo=BoYgw>