Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 03:29:07 -0700 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: gf128_add can be marked as __pure2 Message-ID: <CAF6rxgkQx5095ouDhXWhi_8i5KARmsS%2BL_Pf56QBES_OkvwyNA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgnt9eXuLxAa6ZVc7k-CjQYUjfLW4%2B%2BYe%2BQM2giMFwjv8A@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF6rxgn7eEu5WZBH93N4AMHcwCwU3cdhH3rhQunTY%2BCo4PvX4w@mail.gmail.com> <20180317173815.GM75576@funkthat.com> <CAF6rxgnt9eXuLxAa6ZVc7k-CjQYUjfLW4%2B%2BYe%2BQM2giMFwjv8A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17 March 2018 at 11:38, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote: > On 17 March 2018 at 10:38, John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> wrote: >> Eitan Adler wrote this message on Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 19:15 -0800: >>> Is there any reason not to apply this patch? >> >> I don't see why there wouldn't be.. >> >>> __pure2 means __attribute__((const)) which is correct in this case as >>> gf128_add read no global memory: For extra clarity, since this is crypto related, can you please accept here: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15786 -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgkQx5095ouDhXWhi_8i5KARmsS%2BL_Pf56QBES_OkvwyNA>