Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:05:05 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What are people using for MUA's nowadays? Message-ID: <xzpr82892ke.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <a06001a10bb94cf9154e1@[10.0.1.2]> (Brad Knowles's message of "Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:14:53 %2B0200") References: <20030922104213.L335@www.bluecirclesoft.com> <a06001a10bb94cf9154e1@[10.0.1.2]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be> writes: > On the CLI side, you can use SpamAssassin with procmail, and > mutt will work well (although pine would probably also work). If > you're doing anything related to PGP, I think mutt would be a better > choice, since it was designed (by Mike Elkins, the author of the > PGP/MIME RFC) to integrate those kinds of features from Day One. Mutt > has always worked well as a POP3 client, but used to have poor support > for IMAP. I don't know if that has since changed. Mutt has had more than adequate IMAP support for quite a while now. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpr82892ke.fsf>