Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:50:34 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>, Guido Falsi <madpilot@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r388648 - in head/net: asterisk11 asterisk13 Message-ID: <20151109155034.GB60954@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <BF08F2E2-64D0-433B-ACE4-270886594519@adamw.org> References: <201506052330.t55NUBZL020965@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1511082001320.2548@anthias> <564044BC.5050203@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1511091255000.2548@anthias> <077EDBDC-8EF1-44FA-9D17-90345C2956F5@adamw.org> <20151109153801.GA60954@FreeBSD.org> <BF08F2E2-64D0-433B-ACE4-270886594519@adamw.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:41:43AM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > On 9 Nov, 2015, at 8:38, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > I'm still hesitating about "Build with" vs. "Use". I'm thinking of cases > > when GCC bits are required, but not exactly to build things. At this point > > I'm more inclined towards "Use modern GCC (from ports)" but still not 100% > > confident it's the best wording. > > I think the difference there is pedantic, and possibly more confusing. While > it is true that "build with" may not always be accurate, "use" is so generic > as to convey practically nothing. OK, I buy this; after all, "build with" is always applicable to the package itself (ir)regardless of exactly how GCC is being used. > My vote is for "Build with modern GCC (from ports)"[.] Let it be then, +1 on this very wording. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151109155034.GB60954>