Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 12:48:04 -0400 From: Peter Radcliffe <pir@pir.net> To: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fwd: Suggestion for laptop suspension Message-ID: <20000830124804.A17183@pir.net> In-Reply-To: <200008301550.e7UFoSG06876@billy-club.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 09:50:28AM -0600 References: <20000830082712.A31339@sharmas.dhs.org> <200008300753.BAA14369@harmony.village.org> <XFMail.000830173512.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20000830082712.A31339@sharmas.dhs.org> <200008301550.e7UFoSG06876@billy-club.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh <imp@village.org> probably said: > I seriously doubt that this is the case. In the past I've looked at > these image files, and they are just images. No compression, just > bits slammed to the disk. A suspend to disk on my Sony VAIO at least > always takes the same amount of time, no matter if it was just booted, > or had been running to the point of needing swap. Whereas I noted on my Vaio that it suspends to disk considerably faster if it's just booted. It seems to be less blatant on my newer Z505HS, but it was quite obvious on my 505TR with 128Mb. Just a datapoint. P. -- pir pir@pir.net pir@net.tufts.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000830124804.A17183>