Date: Thu, 13 Mar 1997 17:08:01 +1100 (EDT) From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> To: michaelh@cet.co.jp (Michael Hancock) Cc: ccsanady@nyx.pr.mcs.net, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Solaris TPC-C benchmarks (with Oracle) Message-ID: <199703130611.WAA07351@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.95.970313130458.25395A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> from "Michael Hancock" at Mar 13, 97 01:15:02 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In some mail from Michael Hancock, sie said: > > It was a price performance measure. The actual throughput was quote, "The > performance score of Solaris, measuring transactions per minute, was > equally impressive: 6679.50tpmC throughput." > > This was Oracle on an IBM PC Server. > > Contrast this with the Compaq/Sybase/UnixWare benchmark in November. "The > TPC-C result of 8,311.43 tpmC was based on a ProLiant 5000 configured with > four 200 MHz Pentium Pro processors each with 512KB cache, 4-GB of memory, > using the SCO's UnixWare operating system version 2.1.1, running Sybase's > SQL Server 11.0.3 database application." Did the run Solaris on the same hardware or different hardware ? Having used a Proliant 2500 which has RAID-5 disk, I assume the 5000 does too..
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703130611.WAA07351>