Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 17:36:56 -0600 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: developers@freebsd.org, security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stable branch Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20001005173257.048b9f00@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200010051830.MAA01024@harmony.village.org> References: <Your message of "Thu, 05 Oct 2000 11:03:42 MDT." <4.3.2.7.2.20001005105420.04a7b540@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20001005105420.04a7b540@localhost> <20001004220906.D50210@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:30 PM 10/5/2000, Warner Losh wrote: >Otherwise would do a PR spin with the following patch to 3.x would do >the trick (I'd call it -solid, because -stable is suitable for >production machines). Personally, I would equate "-SOLID" with "suitable for production machines" whereas -STABLE would be "OK for application developers and eager/early adopters but still settling down to the confidence level of -SOLID." Which might imply setting things up so that the -STABLE branch becomes -SOLID after, say, a good .2 release. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20001005173257.048b9f00>