Date: Sat, 2 May 1998 15:26:52 -0400 (EDT) From: spork <spork@super-g.com> To: am@f1.ru Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: threads performance Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980502152414.5070A-100000@super-g.inch.com> In-Reply-To: <199805011835.WAA00793@px.f1.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yeah, I had to do some ugly hacks to get mit-pthreads to work under 3.0, but we've seen much better performance and longer uptimes. We're coming up on a week without restarting it, which is a major landmark. Charles Sprickman spork@super-g.com ---- On Fri, 1 May 1998, Andrew Maltsev wrote: > > Any recommendations on what to do to get the best performance here? I'd > > give up a CPU if I could get more stability and an easier target for Monty > > to troubleshoot on. Anyone else here use mysql? Any opinions? Should I > > try again with MIT-pthreads? > > I'm using. And have no luck with freebsd's libc_r, so my mysql is > compiled with mit-threads. No problems - uptime is about month now - > except mit-thr doesn't support unix-sockets. > > px# mysqladmin st > > Uptime: 2257747 Running threads: 1 Questions: 440811 Reloads: 3 Open tables: 33 > > It's on db of about 12 megs and 30'000 records. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980502152414.5070A-100000>