Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 18:06:59 +0100 From: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Wanted: Testers for an alternate to /usr/obj (as we know it). Message-ID: <19293.835463219@palmer.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 22 Jun 1996 17:07:31 %2B0200." <Pine.BSI.3.94.960622170317.5198A-100000@klemm.gtn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andreas Klemm wrote in message ID <Pine.BSI.3.94.960622170317.5198A-100000@klemm.gtn.com>: > On Fri, 21 Jun 1996, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > Well, I sat down this morning with the intention that /usr/obj change > > its spots before sundown and it looks like I made it with time to > > spare. > > Do your changes make now or in future possible, to compile the > source tree totally independend from the files in /usr/include > and /usr/share/mk and such, that would allow to compile every > wanted OS Release independently from what is installed in the system.. You really need FULL independance from the installed system, as make world currently spams new compilers and libraries over the system before doing anything else. I consider this a bug, or at least a mis-feature. Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19293.835463219>