Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 05 May 2007 06:18:51 +0200
From:      Attilio Rao <attilio@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de>
Subject:   Re: PANIC: blockable slep lock (sx) msi @ ....msi.c:374
Message-ID:  <463C05AB.3050307@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <463B9268.1040305@samsco.org>
References:  <463B7A1D.6020602@omnisec.de> <463BF1A7.1050504@FreeBSD.org> <463B9268.1040305@samsco.org>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

Scott Long wrote:
> The real problem is that infrastructure code like MSI should not hold 
> locks across calls to consumer code.  That's what needs to be fixed, not
> hacks to WITNESS.

Actually, I think nobody proposed to hack WITNESS, mine was just a 
question about a related topic.
I'm still trying to figure out why msi currently uses an sx (I suspect 
there are some sleeping point).

Attilio



home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?463C05AB.3050307>