Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:14:22 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org, peter@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pad argument for mmap/lseek/etc. Message-ID: <200710101714.23286.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20071008172545.GA91406@freebsd.org> References: <20071007140237.GA44735@freebsd.org> <20071008153106.GN2180@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20071008172545.GA91406@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 08 October 2007 01:25:45 pm Roman Divacky wrote: > > The interesting question is whether the _SYS_SYSPROTO_H and absense of the > > sys/sysproto.h supported. Or, shall we remove these #ifdef blocks instead > > of fixing them in whole kernel. > > I also support this idea... does anyone have an argument against or should I > just provide a patch (removing those definitions) Many people (myself included) find it handy to have the uap structure definition with the function. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200710101714.23286.jhb>