Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 12:35:26 -0700 (PDT) From: caindie <user10508@gmail.com> To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux emulation Message-ID: <1336764926995-5704233.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <assp.04786d3f56.305c60a3491adcfd1f87f0c02da1dc0b@ringofsaturn.com> References: <1336755968776-5703566.post@n5.nabble.com> <assp.04786d3f56.305c60a3491adcfd1f87f0c02da1dc0b@ringofsaturn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>What about trying to update the port and submitting a PR to have it >updated for everyone? I think updating the port and solving my problem are separate issues. I don't know that updating the port; linux-base or gtk2 will solve my problem. There may be more to my problem than just an old version of gtk2. Celtx is built as a mozilla application and uses the mozilla/firefox source code base to compile. Its also possible that updating the linux gtk2 version may - require - updating the linux-base port because of rpm dependencies. If linux base requires updating, I think it is reasonable to ask whether it is still useful to base linux base on fedora. Fedora seems more and more to be full of sound and fury - the question is what if anything does fedora signify anymore. I'm trying to solve a specific problem; linux base in ports needs updating to be sure; I don't think the answer to that should revolve around my specific need. I think the user community will better served by more of a "big picture" look at linux emulation and freebsd - going forward. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/linux-emulation-tp5703566p5704233.html Sent from the freebsd-emulation mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1336764926995-5704233.post>