Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 12:21:54 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> To: ticso@cicely.de Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: additional com-port Message-ID: <20030614102154.GA49721@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20030614002946.GG7279@cicely8.cicely.de> References: <20030613210519.GH338@km.ua> <20030613224912.GB7279@cicely8.cicely.de> <20030613225959.GI338@km.ua> <20030613230232.GJ338@km.ua> <20030613232116.GC7279@cicely8.cicely.de> <20030613233057.GM338@km.ua> <20030613235336.GF7279@cicely8.cicely.de> <20030614002429.GN338@km.ua> <20030614002946.GG7279@cicely8.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 02:29:47AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 03:24:29AM +0300, Maxim Mazurok wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 01:53:37AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > > > > >> >What is wrong with the second onboard serial? > > >> >You just have to remove the flags which declare it to be a special > > >> >debug interface for to kernel. > > >> >See sio(4) manpage for details on flags. > > >> > > >> hmmm > > >> sio2 - it's no traditional com-port > > >> it's ISA Cisco router console (cisco AP-EC) > > >> i no need second onboard com-port, but i need access to cisco console > > > > > >And you can't just give it another IRQ? > > > > in SRM for onboard ports? > > You can check for, but I doubt that it's supported. I'm afraid you can forget that, yes.. -- | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030614102154.GA49721>