Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 15:44:38 +1100 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: eivind@dimaga.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NULL as ((void*)0) (was Re: strlen() question) Message-ID: <199702150444.PAA04750@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>[1] There has come up one serious objection here, relating to C++. If this >objection is correct, it mean that the proposal absolutely should be >dropped. Besides, nobody but me seems to be in favour, and it isn't >important to me, so... NULL could be ifdefed for c++. However, gcc seems to accept `char *p = (void *)0;' at all warning levels. I don't know C++ well enough to tell if this is a bug. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702150444.PAA04750>