Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:13:58 -0800 (PST) From: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org> To: dwhite@gumbysoft.com Cc: bland@mail.ru Subject: Re: truss issue Message-ID: <200312152114.hBFLDweF068169@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: <20031215084226.W81321@carver.gumbysoft.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 15 Dec, Doug White wrote: > My reading of it is that it is truss hitting itself with the same signal > that killed the process that it was tracing so that truss will exit > showing that it was killed by a signal. So this is actually implementing > the requested functionality. Processes that exit due to a signal don't > return an exit code. It seems keyed on 'sigexit' whatever that is. Hmn, I wonder if it would be cleaner to exec() the executable to be traced in the parent process and run truss in the child ...home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200312152114.hBFLDweF068169>