Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 14:40:23 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Bernhard Schmidt <bschmidt@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Another scan + comlock LOR Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=UwuwE31ww5neWDK2GWfbRyX1E_LAbfjw_Rmb3g_VRhQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Bernhard, Take a look at this. This is from my if_ath_tx branch, but the locking is still problematic inside net80211. I've posted before about this to freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org; it's a very obvious LOR when you've traced the code. Thanks! Adrian 1st 0xc0831784 ath0_scan_lock (ath0_scan_lock) @ /data/freebsd/mips/if_ath_tx/src/sys/net80211/ieee80211_node.c:1937 2nd 0xc0830014 ath0_com_lock (ath0_com_lock) @ /data/freebsd/mips/if_ath_tx/src/sys/net80211/ieee80211_node.c:2510 KDB: stack backtrace: db_trace_thread+30 (?,?,?,?) ra 8036145c sp c0781ab0 sz 24 db_trace_self+1c (?,?,?,?) ra 80074dbc sp c0781ac8 sz 24 80074d88+34 (?,?,?,?) ra 801e090c sp c0781ae0 sz 416 kdb_backtrace+44 (?,?,?,?) ra 801f8808 sp c0781c80 sz 24 801f87d4+34 (?,?,?,?) ra 801f94c4 sp c0781c98 sz 32 witness_checkorder+9cc (?,?,803ebf40,9ce) ra 80199320 sp c0781cb8 sz 80 _mtx_lock_flags+c4 (?,?,?,?) ra 802acf28 sp c0781d08 sz 48 ieee80211_node_leave+b8 (?,?,?,?) ra 802ad510 sp c0781d38 sz 48 ieee80211_node_timeout+2e4 (?,?,?,?) ra 801bf000 sp c0781d68 sz 64 softclock+298 (?,?,?,?) ra 80181280 sp c0781da8 sz 88 intr_event_execute_handlers+158 (?,?,?,?) ra 80182288 sp c0781e00 sz 40 8018217c+10c (?,?,?,?) ra 8017e56c sp c0781e28 sz 48 fork_exit+a8 (?,?,?,?) ra 80359ba0 sp c0781e58 sz 40 fork_trampoline+10 (?,?,?,?) ra 0 sp c0781e80 sz 0 pid 11
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=UwuwE31ww5neWDK2GWfbRyX1E_LAbfjw_Rmb3g_VRhQ>