Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 00:46:03 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Soft Updates Message-ID: <19980510004603.A16999@keltia.freenix.fr> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980509100041.5106D-100000@current1.whistle.com>; from Julian Elischer on Sat, May 09, 1998 at 10:01:33AM -0700 References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980509112508.5379A-100000@bmccane> <Pine.BSF.3.95.980509100041.5106D-100000@current1.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Julian Elischer: > you need to use the -n option of tunefs on an unmounted filesystem > it's not a mount option.. Why not BTW ? async/noasync are mount options so one could expect softupdates to be the same. Is there an reason for the current scheme (not that I mind but it would make switch it on/off easier, especially for /). -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #8: Tue Apr 21 02:45:53 CEST 1998 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980510004603.A16999>