Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 05 Nov 2011 19:42:12 +0100
From:      "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
To:        Ivan Klymenko <fidaj@ukr.net>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Jeff Roberson <jroberson@jroberson.net>, Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: Increase the degree of interactivity ULE scheduler
Message-ID:  <4EB58384.6020205@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
In-Reply-To: <20111104153318.0f3b9c9a@nonamehost.>
References:  <4ea29f2c.a823440a.4aa0.3599SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1111031018030.1995@desktop> <4eb3032e.a82eec0a.12ad.ffff8d64SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1111031120340.1995@desktop> <20111104153318.0f3b9c9a@nonamehost.>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
Am 11/04/11 14:33, schrieb Ivan Klymenko:
> Maybe useful the following information:
> This problem appears not to all architectures and types of CPU.
> on the Russian forums
> http://www.bsdportal.ru/viewtopic.php?t=24900
> http://forum.lissyara.su/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=34641&sid=aa596f0b70806ba053011da911f9ccae
> was a brute force to find out that:
> there is a suspicion that:
> - for AMD processors, this problem is not observed at all when the number of cores >= 2
> - on all single-core is the problem
> - only for some models with Intel >= 2 cores of the problem is not found
> 
> Perhaps, after all, avg@ rights (Subject: couple of sched_ule issues), that is not working
> properly mechanism rebalancing and to determine the topology of CPU?
> All converge, because my patch ( http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111022132817.35db5ccd )
> for SMP systems just do respite for rebalancing, which eliminates the problem with interactivity ...
> 
> Thanks!
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

Is the patch going to be merged into HEAD shortly?

Regards,
Oliver


[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOtYOJAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8lMwIAOEnBlpKK/CiNn1wQzR0AVfs
UvnSYpeN5IGTLW2P919x+yvDRMNjwKBJX5ocWnxJ233DKl31f44ZrLFXM5Ls1Qpb
cu/3zlLmxIP5Rf7G/rl2XIcHZ0B3+Fz7N2b4muGfetVbuo0OcuGB5l7g4MZgTWGm
5H83noUwtCj3HDBsUlcMpQS/j9yLgz+gSo+7f3Xwe0xDAGi/2448tc7zfbKTWwRj
c0Oh+m2TX7Q6xUqIEMi2NWNmvmJHSqNAlDlrHzzpJLvNuN5dEvFOnZKukVWLT6OS
d5q97eAQxZaRLUCRjUjjBBIrWfditaKisvGEHIJqc/BtmuUo0x0GVpWu8kyeFag=
=Cd8+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EB58384.6020205>