Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 05:25:41 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Heads up, a bit: ephemeral port range changes Message-ID: <20020405052428.C63621-100000@patrocles.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <p0510150fb8d25727a726@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > >Any reason why we can't just say that in UPDATING, and then the > >few who do have problems (and I think it will be few) have an > >instant fix in UPDATING while they get their firewall sorted out ? > > I think that if the sysctl's are included in UPDATING, then it > sounds reasonable to MFC this change into -stable. > > -- > Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu In case anyone's still reading, clearly documenting the change in UPDATING is the plan. Warner should be making the change sometime in the next day or two, at which point I will go ahead and MFC the change. However, I will be going out of town this weekend, so I won't be able to do the MFC until Monday. Just FYI, Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020405052428.C63621-100000>