Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 15:11:00 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Sergey Zakharchenko <doublef.mobile@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VIMAGE vs SysV IPC Message-ID: <A4D48E04-FDBC-46CF-BFD6-F1BEA057F503@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <CADYCxoMrTkU-3D63i9=o5YB9YaT85pgxFc7HPa4TyAF9W34DdA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CADYCxoMrTkU-3D63i9=o5YB9YaT85pgxFc7HPa4TyAF9W34DdA@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> On 02 Mar 2016, at 14:53 , Sergey Zakharchenko <doublef.mobile@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > As far as I can tell, jails still do not properly encapsulate SysV > IPC. Should I look into VIMAGE or is situation the same there? There’s a patch floating around. We still hope to have the VNET teardown, the VIMAGE framework in for 11 and put that one on top of all this. Fingers crossed. /bzhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A4D48E04-FDBC-46CF-BFD6-F1BEA057F503>