Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:22:52 -0500 From: "Scott Ullrich" <sullrich@gmail.com> To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?V=E1clav_Haisman?=" <V.Haisman@sh.cvut.cz> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Kevin Downey <redchin@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Duplicate IPFW rules Message-ID: <d5992baf0612211222u37630f30t6257d91ccdafed61@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <458AEC99.1040003@sh.cvut.cz> References: <458AD815.3010601@sh.cvut.cz> <1d3ed48c0612211144s631e2cendbfcfb6acfae9ef1@mail.gmail.com> <458AE623.4070701@sh.cvut.cz> <d5992baf0612211205k5cc2c81dod95d448706396b96@mail.gmail.com> <458AEC99.1040003@sh.cvut.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/21/06, V=E1clav Haisman <V.Haisman@sh.cvut.cz> wrote: > Oh, I did not realise this use. Hmm...still, I thought that this is what > tables are for :) Yep, thats another usage for tables. But tables have not been around for very long either. Considering that I have used IPFW since FreeBSD version 2 or something or another these fancy features have not always been around :) Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d5992baf0612211222u37630f30t6257d91ccdafed61>