Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:14:52 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, alfred@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, deischen@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, yar@comp.chem.msu.su Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen fts-compat.c fts-compat.h Message-ID: <20070828181452.GA78587@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20070827.203029.-432838018.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0708242252520.15344@sea.ntplx.net> <20070824.213615.146406398.imp@bsdimp.com> <20070828005654.GA50401@dragon.NUXI.org> <20070827.203029.-432838018.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 08:30:29PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20070828005654.GA50401@dragon.NUXI.org> > "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> writes: > : On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 09:36:15PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > In message: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0708242252520.15344@sea.ntplx.net> > : > Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> writes: > : > : I guess the build system should be more tolerant of this, but > : > : there are bound to be problems regardless. I don't see why > : > : the install tools can't also either have their own set of > : > : libraries (utilizing LD_LIBRARY_PATH) or be built static. > : > > : > There's much resistance to building everything that the build system > : > might be used being build static. It adds too much time and > : > complexity to the build system, the opponents say. > : > : I've never heard an argument against building these bits static. > : What's the issue? > > I thought you were one of the folks making this argument when we last > changed the FILE structure and related hangers on. Hum, I don't recall having that position against static binaries. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070828181452.GA78587>