Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 19:14:32 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Yoichi Nakayama <yoichi@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, anray@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [ports-i386@FreeBSD.org: pure-xemacs21-mule-0.6_1 failed on i386 6] Message-ID: <20060213001432.GA1411@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <873biouomu.wl%yoichi@FreeBSD.org> References: <20060212203335.GF93731@xor.obsecurity.org> <873biouomu.wl%yoichi@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 08:46:17AM +0900, Yoichi Nakayama wrote:
> Andray,
> I've received following report that site-packages/lisp directory remains
> after deletion of elisp port. I found other ports e.g. flim-xemacs21-mule
> also meet the same problem. Would it be handled in indivisual ports or in
> xemacs21-mule package (where site-packages/{etc,info,man,pkginfo} are handled)?
The errors below indicate that the directory was created by this port,
so as it stands, this means that this port needs to remove it. It
might be better in the long term to make the xemacs packages handle
such directories, but then you'd also have to make all the other ports
stop trying to remove it themselves, so the patch might take a bit of
work.
Kris
--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFD789oWry0BWjoQKURAtINAJ0X/Rr5L/xOOMPB6mAqj46PGnpIywCgheXN
7JF1sJ78RVQx3rDFljpYW2Q=
=yIqY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060213001432.GA1411>