Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:40:02 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> To: Carmel <carmel_ny@hotmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW firewall and TCP ports Message-ID: <20100930193436.N62022@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <20100930165112.D62022@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20100929205531.76F991065713@hub.freebsd.org> <20100930165112.D62022@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Ian Smith wrote: > countries are long gone. For some scientific (and policy) rationale of > the increasingly fragmented nature of new allocations down to /22 (ie 64 > IP addresses) have a look at http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/ Oops; a /22 allocation is of course 4 times a /24, ~1024 addresses. Ian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100930193436.N62022>