Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 19:57:02 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-arch <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Time for turning off gdb by default? Or worse... Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmom4TXpC=dJUmW_Oj9AzRw4YkcpwMmrcboG83WMV6ZJp1A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5344B551.30200@freebsd.org> References: <DD38131E-9A43-4EFA-A27D-ED6B64F6A35A@bsdimp.com> <20140408212629.GD21331@kib.kiev.ua> <5344B551.30200@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8 April 2014 19:49, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 4/9/14, 5:26 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 02:34:35PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: >> I personally need and use this. I also use standalone build of the stock >> gdb. Both in-tree gdb/kgdb and stock gdb are incommutable (for me). > > > if lldb works then fine for userland, but I REALLY need kgdb to work. > also does lldb work with the xxgdb and ddd frontends? > does it have its own frontend that makes it usable? > Or can we just hack llvm to generate dwarf-2 by default, and only flip it to dwarf-4 when it's done? because this whole situation is just plain dumb. -a
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmom4TXpC=dJUmW_Oj9AzRw4YkcpwMmrcboG83WMV6ZJp1A>