Date: Sat, 16 May 1998 12:05:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Soft update vs noatime Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980516120445.16642G-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <l03020900b1830fcf8550@[194.32.164.2]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have not tested that combination however I think that softupdates may make no-atime less useful. (though leaving atimes out totally would still be most efficient) On Sat, 16 May 1998, Bob Bishop wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any reason not to use noatime with soft updates? > > > -- > Bob Bishop (0118) 977 4017 international code +44 118 > rb@gid.co.uk fax (0118) 989 4254 between 0800 and 1800 UK > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.980516120445.16642G-100000>