Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:23:54 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tilman_Keskin=F6z?= <arved@FreeBSD.org> To: Valentin Nechayev <netch@netch.kiev.ua> Cc: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/134182: ports-mgmt/portupgrade incorrectly handles manual reject to upgrade Message-ID: <4E2E6B8A.6060700@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110726050551.GC1941@netch.kiev.ua> References: <201107251154.p6PBsPba098661@freefall.freebsd.org> <20110726050551.GC1941@netch.kiev.ua>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 07/26/2011 07:05 AM, Valentin Nechayev wrote: > Do you remember FreeBSD motto - "Tools, not policy"? You have depriven us of > good tool to track dependencies, which still can be useful for complex > circumstances as locally crafted packages, basing on suspect which can be > easily fixed with one small option. Well, it is just harder for you to shoot your foot without an automatic tool, but all the pkg_tools still allow what you want to do. Another option for you might be to provide a patch and apply for the job as the future portupgrade maintainer. Then you will get the mail from all the people that used this feature an ran into problems.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E2E6B8A.6060700>