Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 14:50:05 -0300 From: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@FreeBSD.org> To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/codemedic Makefile Message-ID: <20020924175027.78486.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> In-Reply-To: <20020924172418.GW69627@procyon.firepipe.net> References: <200209241722.g8OHMdwZ080020@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020924172418.GW69627@procyon.firepipe.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 10:23:56AM -0700, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 10:22:39AM -0700, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote:
> > Modified files:
> > devel/codemedic Makefile
> > Log:
> > Mark NO_PACKAGE since it ignores CXX because it breaks if CXX is
> > other than g++
>
> I don't understand your reasoning here. Just because something
> can only be compiled with g++ doesn't mean we can't package it.
I was just following the reasoning in the Porters Handbook.
It states that things that do not respect C{C,XX,FLAS} should be
marked as so. So far, we have been using NO_PACKAGE to do that.
I have no problem with marking it otherwise. :)
I was just following protocol. Besides, I can't seem to be able to
fix a building issue in this port. Some interaction between bison
and g++. So, I'll probably mark it BROKEN if I can't find a solution
before the ports freeze is over. NO_PACKAGE is the smaller of our
concerns with this port. Such a shame. :(
--
Mario S F Ferreira - DF - Brazil - "I guess this is a signature."
Computer Science Undergraduate | FreeBSD Committer | CS Developer
flames to beloved devnull@someotherworldbeloworabove.org
feature, n: a documented bug | bug, n: an undocumented feature
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020924175027.78486.qmail>