Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 20:16:12 +0100 (CET) From: Blaz Zupan <blaz@amis.net> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pccard not working on 4.0-RELEASE Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003152012460.9519-100000@titanic.medinet.si> In-Reply-To: <200003151849.LAA88375@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> : pcic0: <Vadem 469> at port 0x3e0 iomem 0xd0000 on isa0 > This is a slight lie. > You might want to try this at 0x3e2. It is worth a shot. Bingo, it works! Now I'm wondering, GENERIC says: device pcic0 at isa? irq 10 port 0x3e0 iomem 0xd0000 device pcic1 at isa? irq 11 port 0x3e2 iomem 0xd4000 disable Neither seems quite correct for my situation, where I use device pcic0 at isa? port 0x3e2 iomem 0xd0000 Is there a standard for this and are the above addresses just backwards? I'll do another test with just device pcic0 at isa? as specified in LINT. Blaz Zupan, blaz@amis.net, http://home.amis.net/blaz/ Medinet d.o.o., Linhartova 21, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0003152012460.9519-100000>