Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 17:51:36 -0200 (EDT) From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis <jonny@jonny.eng.br> To: julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer) Cc: jonny@jonny.eng.br, asami@cs.berkeley.edu, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: softupdates on / Message-ID: <199901281951.RAA26420@roma.coe.ufrj.br> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901281130220.304-100000@s204m82.isp.whistle.com> from Julian Elischer at "Jan 28, 1999 11:30:45 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
#define quoting(Julian Elischer)
// On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Joao Carlos Mendes Luis wrote:
// > Is there a strong reason for softupdates be a tunefs option, instead of
// > a mount option ? This could be easily solved by a
//
// kirk has convinsing arguments against it and "He's the man"
^^^^^^^^^
I got your point, but can you list these arguments ? If it's only "he
wants it this way, god only knows why", it's allright, but if there's
a technical reason, I'd like to know.
Thanks in advance,
Jonny
--
Joao Carlos Mendes Luis M.Sc. Student
jonny@jonny.eng.br Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
"This .sig is not meant to be politically correct."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901281951.RAA26420>