Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 15:39:07 +0200 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" <stephen@missouri.edu> Cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do you still need CTM? Message-ID: <201508221339.t7MDd7Pc019633@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Your message "Fri, 21 Aug 2015 02:46:42 -0000." <55D69111.4050901@missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Stephen, cc ctm-users@
> I really do agree with the person from FreeBSD central who emailed me.
Proxy presenting views of an anonymous correspondent who
fails to direct address <ctm-users@freebsd.org> caused speculation
on anonymous's guessed concerns, wasted time & created FUD.
Better to tell any anonymous to { Read
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/ctm-users/
Then address ctm-users@freebsd.org , preferably with code enhancements }.
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com
Reply after previous text, like a play - Not before, which looses context.
Indent previous text with "> " Insert new lines before 80 chars.
Send plain text, Not quoted-printable, Not HTML, Not ms.doc, Not base64.
Subsidise contraception V. Global warming, pollution, famine, migration.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201508221339.t7MDd7Pc019633>