Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:04:09 -0700
From:      Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
To:        Matt Thyer <matt.thyer@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Problems booting 9.0-BETA1 memstick
Message-ID:  <E07B9DA6-21AA-47D6-816D-4189A007B468@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACM2%2B-4aU8VqaaKQnAXszFsU-097NLqHGdJP_u5LnbBWVoVtng@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAMG0UAh1=Jy_eD5t%2BV_MkhVJrMFoe-OQQFgut1USr6v9CWMj4A@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1108302109370.49311@wonkity.com> <CACM2%2B-4aU8VqaaKQnAXszFsU-097NLqHGdJP_u5LnbBWVoVtng@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sep 1, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Matt Thyer wrote:
> Shouldn't we use MBR partitioning instead of GPT for the memstick image ?

They aren't exclusive.  Anything which doesn't understand GPT should
fall back to the 'protective' MBR kept inside the GPT format...

Regards,
-- 
-Chuck




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E07B9DA6-21AA-47D6-816D-4189A007B468>