Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Sep 2002 21:51:17 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        marcus@marcuscom.com
Cc:        julian@elischer.org, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: mozilla busted?
Message-ID:  <20020919.215117.60502717.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <1032493248.346.46.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com>
References:  <1032492643.346.44.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <20020919.213850.132602795.imp@bsdimp.com> <1032493248.346.46.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <1032493248.346.46.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com>
            Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> writes:
: On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 23:38, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <1032492643.346.44.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com>
: >             Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> writes:
: > : On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 23:22, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > : > In message: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0209191920510.14811-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
: > : >             Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> writes:
: > : > : Is it statically linked?
: > : > 
: > : > Yup.
: > : 
: > : You'll need to rebuild against the new libc_r, then.
: > 
: > Yuck.  I'd rather nail jello to a tree than try to update a port that
: > complicated.
: 
: If it makes you feel better, I just ran a compile on my -CURRENT
: machine, and it went fine.  Both mozilla and mozilla-devel should build
: out of the tree....with or without jello.

Do you know if this breaks libc_r.so.4.0 too?  I'm thinking of just
grabbing the build from Mozilla.org...

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020919.215117.60502717.imp>