Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:52:58 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" <jeff-ml@mountin.net> Cc: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: libc shlib version (consensus?) Message-ID: <20001114145258.A91291@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.20001114155102.00c23150@207.227.119.2>; from jeff-ml@mountin.net on Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 04:03:19PM -0600 References: <vqc3dgvmpz2.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <31309.974061923@winston.osd.bsdi.com> <200011130413.eAD4DKj41211@vashon.polstra.com> <vqcd7g09vtq.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <200011131605.eADG5H342237@vashon.polstra.com> <20001113095036.C38290@dragon.nuxi.com> <vqc3dgvmpz2.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <20001113152610.C39667@dragon.nuxi.com> <4.3.2.20001114155102.00c23150@207.227.119.2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 04:03:19PM -0600, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
> Is the bump going to happen before 4.2 or not?
I don't know. I'd like to hear Satoshi's response to my last email on
the topic. The typical test [in this case] would be does a 4.0R shared
binary still run fine on a 4.2-R system. No one has brought this up as
the case. And for the example given, I don't know how bumping libc's
shared version number will solve the problem.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001114145258.A91291>