Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 31 Jul 2011 11:50:18 +0300
From:      C++ RTMP Server Support <support@rtmpd.com>
To:        Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Jin-Sih Lin <linpct@gmail.com>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/net/crtmpserver Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/net/crtmpserver/files crtmpserver.in
Message-ID:  <4CDE28BF-86F8-4454-B49C-675184173549@rtmpd.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E3516C3.9070605@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201107301549.p6UFn7rK070976@repoman.freebsd.org> <4E3495B0.3070405@FreeBSD.org> <D2E25D19-0A8E-4081-BB71-81EE07A2BC77@rtmpd.com> <4E35108D.1040907@FreeBSD.org> <4E3510F7.2000405@FreeBSD.org> <7C192122-697C-49BB-AADB-446C24962000@rtmpd.com> <4E3516C3.9070605@FreeBSD.org>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

Finally, got it :)

I'll prepare a patch right now which will include the special $pidfile variable.

Tx for you patience

On Jul 31, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Doug Barton wrote:

> On 07/31/2011 01:34, C++ RTMP Server Support wrote:
>> Oh, I see the difference now. You basically use another construct to
>> gather the (default) values. IMHO, my solution is much much clear
>> because all variables which are read from rc.conf are in one single
>> place and for beginners like me the script is easier to read.
>> 
>> Besides, you remove one variable (crtmpserver_config) and you put
>> it's default value inside the required_files variable, but you add
>> another one called pidfile.
>> 
>> Again, IMHO, my version is easier to read. 
> 
> You still don't understand.
> 
> pidfile= is a requirement. As I said in my first message, it's special
> to rc.subr. This needs to be fixed.
> 
> As for how pidfile= and required_files= are set, that's a style issue
> that I'm less concerned about. What you are saying is that this is
> easier to read:
> 
> : ${name_config:=foo}
> : ${name_pidfile:=bar}
> 
> required_files=$name_config
> pidfile=$name_pidfile
> 
> What I'm saying is that doing it that way means that you're working
> harder than you have to. The way I had it in the patch means that each
> variable only has to be handled once. It may be slightly more difficult
> to read for novices, but it's not _that_ complex; and reduces the
> chances that a mistake will be made. However, if you choose not to use
> the style that I suggested, I'm not too concerned about that.
> 
> However, the pidfile issue has to be fixed.
> 
> 
> Doug
> 
> -- 
> 
> 	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
> 			-- OK Go
> 
> 	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
> 	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/
> 

------
C++ RTMP Server Support
Email: support@rtmpd.com
Web: http://www.rtmpd.com


help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CDE28BF-86F8-4454-B49C-675184173549>