Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:59:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Harti Brandt <brandt@fokus.gmd.de> To: "Eugene L. Vorokov" <vel@bugz.infotecs.ru> Cc: <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Message-ID: <20010824115804.B43940-100000@beagle.fokus.gmd.de> In-Reply-To: <200108240945.f7O9jmH01400@bugz.infotecs.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Eugene L. Vorokov wrote:
ELV>> > It's kinda late in the process to be complaining about this, but I just noticed this myself...
ELV>
ELV>Why not just symlink csh to tcsh then ?
ELV>
ELV>vel@bugz:/sys/modules/paudit # ls -l /bin/*csh
ELV>-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 740996 Aug 23 23:19 /bin/csh
ELV>-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 740996 Aug 23 23:19 /bin/tcsh
^
ELV>
ELV>Is this really reasonable ?
What's wrong with hard links?
# ls -l /bin/csh /bin/tcsh
16112 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 740880 Aug 10 14:35 csh
16112 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 740880 Aug 10 14:35 tcsh
harti
--
harti brandt, http://www.fokus.gmd.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private
brandt@fokus.fhg.de
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010824115804.B43940-100000>