Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 17:36:52 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: Rob <spamrefuse@yahoo.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: xl(4) & polling Message-ID: <20050511143652.GA64793@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20050511143005.17908.qmail@web54001.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050511100125.GA750@ip.net.ua> <20050511143005.17908.qmail@web54001.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 07:30:05AM -0700, Rob wrote: > Argh, just found out that it is not the polling. > Even without the polling, the ssh-tunnel connection > gets disrupted, although not as frequent as with > the polling. Possibly, the polling makes the problem > more visible, but it not the culprit. > > My apologies for the noise. > > I don't know yet exactly what it is. I use a script > to test whether the ssh-tunnel is still alive; if > not, then the tunnel is renewed. This script has > worked like a charm for almost 6 months. > Don't know what's has changed in the meantime. > > Also, four PCs are part of this ssh-tunnel, which > makes it rather complex to pin-point the problem :(. > > Anyway, that's my problem. > Most important: the xl polling seems OK. > > Meanwhile I have learned a lot more about what > polling actually is! > I very much appreciate the feedback like this one. Often people just shut up after their problem is solved. Thank you! Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCghiEqRfpzJluFF4RAn3yAJ9brSB3Pz9HBJsUo12YD3582tASnwCcD0iW PwqBmPP5pjZ0hNuH15JQCu8= =7Q8+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050511143652.GA64793>