Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 13:15:38 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there a header conflict? Message-ID: <3EA5A2EA.F334CED8@mindspring.com> References: <20030422031429.GA82023@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw> <3EA4C0D3.8F7CF9EE@mindspring.com> <20030423041754.N18663@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans wrote: > On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > > User programs should not reference the "machine" headers directly. > > Also, including <machine/types.h> should fail earlier because this header > shouldn't exist. It was renamed to <machine/_types.h> in -current to > inhibit direct inclusion of it. That's a thought... This is probably an "upgraded" system that failed to delete an old header file, and, as a result, the "configure" program for the package found it and decided to include it. If you have /usr/include/machine/_types.h, then: rm /usr/include/machine/types.h -- Terry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EA5A2EA.F334CED8>