Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 23:06:46 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: lev@freebsd.org, freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8) Message-ID: <20160418200646.GC4841@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <20160418200505.GY1554@FreeBSD.org> References: <20160302235429.GD75641@FreeBSD.org> <57152CE5.5050500@FreeBSD.org> <9D4B9C8B-41D7-42BC-B436-D23EFFF60261@ixsystems.com> <20160418191425.GW1554@FreeBSD.org> <571533B8.6090109@freebsd.org> <20160418194010.GX1554@FreeBSD.org> <20160418200212.GA4841@zxy.spb.ru> <20160418200505.GY1554@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 08:05:05PM +0000, Glen Barber wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:02:12PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > This granularity allows easy removal of things that may not be wanted > > > (such as *-debug*, *-profile*, etc.) on systems with little storage. On > > > one of my testing systems, I removed the tests packages and all debug > > > and profiling, and the number of base system packages is 383. > > > > Easy select from list of 1k items?! > > You kidding? > > > > See the pkg(8) '-g' option. "You have problem. You decide to use rgexps. Your have two problems" (C)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160418200646.GC4841>