Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 11:24:58 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Karl Denninger <karl@mcs.net> Cc: Wilko Bulte <wilko@yedi.iaf.nl>, Jay Nelson <jdn@acp.qiv.com>, blkirk@float.eli.net, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SCSI Bus redundancy... Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.980226112239.1660B-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <19980225132146.02016@mcs.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, Karl Denninger wrote: > If it blew chunks then FSCK has to run - and you damn well better be using a > journaled filesystem or this is going to take a LONG time (ie: 20 minutes to > an hour if you have some large disk storage involved here). > > This is one reason, by the way, that LFS being in a "working" state is > important to these kinds of efforts. > > IBM has a solution that they've sold for quite some time based on AIX (which > inherently uses jfs, a journalled filesystem) which does exactly this. There are also ways to avoid having to do an fsck using the softupdates framework and this is one of Kirk McKusick's next projects. Regards, Mike Hancock To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.95.980226112239.1660B-100000>