Date: Sat, 13 Jan 1996 02:08:43 -0800 From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: nisha@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu Subject: bin/943: df gets confused by huge filesystems Message-ID: <199601131008.CAA07932@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu> Resent-Message-ID: <199601131010.CAA17423@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 943
>Category: bin
>Synopsis: df can't handle large filesystems
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: freebsd-bugs
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Sat Jan 13 02:10:01 PST 1996
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Satoshi Asami
>Organization:
University of California at Berkeley
>Release: FreeBSD 2.1-STABLE i386 (<== this is a lie, it's 2.1R)
>Environment:
2.1R with a striped disk driver (ccd) taken from NetBSD (the
kernel is modified, but I don't think that will make any
difference to this problem).
>Description:
df seems to get confused when there is too many blocks, e.g.:
>How-To-Repeat:
Get yourself a disk array. :)
>Fix:
If I knew, I'd commit it!
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
>> df -k -t local
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/sd0a 32254 16670 13002 56% /
/dev/sd0e 15391 3071 11088 22% /var
/dev/sd0f 530207 276313 211477 57% /usr
/dev/ccd0c 19801168 205004 -3462766 -6% /mnt
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I took a look at the source but can't for the life of myself
can't figure out why it's only the "avail" and "capacity"
fields that get screwed up. For instance, the "1K-blocks" field
is handled in an identical way!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601131008.CAA07932>