Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 01:43:32 +0300 From: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> To: Gavin Atkinson <gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk> Cc: Bachilo Dmitry <root@solink.ru>, stable@freebsd.org, Tai-hwa Liang <avatar@mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw> Subject: Re: mount_smbfs trouble after cvsup Message-ID: <20060305224332.GG21025@comp.chem.msu.su> In-Reply-To: <20060305200015.I89137@ury.york.ac.uk> References: <200602211455.01731.root@solink.ru> <06022119291516.78019@www.mmlab.cse.yzu.edu.tw> <1140606294.59408.8.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> <20060224183435.GA66559@comp.chem.msu.su> <20060305200015.I89137@ury.york.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 08:01:31PM +0000, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > >On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:04:54AM +0000, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > >>Is there a reason this change was made? And is there a reason why > > > >The change wasn't against NETSMBCRYPTO, it just corrected the way > >kernel modules get their options. > > > >>NETSMBCRYPTO is not in GENERIC? To me, it seems that breaking smbfs > >>between releases within 6.x violates POLA... I suspect a large number of > >>people (myself included) have always used smbfs for passworded shares > >>and it's "just worked". > > > >This issue is under investigation by the Release Engineers and yours > >truly. I'm sorry my change to the kernel module framework caused > >the confusion, but so the whole issue has got attention at last. > >Of course, it must be fixed before 6.1-R. In the meanwhile, I'd > >like to hear about any reservations on making NETSMBCRYPTO the > >default case for netsmb/smbfs. Thanks! > > I don't see any problem with making it the default case, since before the > framework cleanup, it effectively was default. Thank you for telling your opinion! I'm preparing the respective commit to HEAD right now, going to MFC it after a short period of testing by CURRENT users. -- Yar
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060305224332.GG21025>