Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 04:16:27 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/libexec/pppoed pppoed.c Message-ID: <20070501001627.GA804@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20070430195237.GA67426@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200704301227.l3UCRwao077864@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070430191144.GA66695@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070430191555.GB87375@nagual.pp.ru> <20070430195237.GA67426@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 03:52:37PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 11:15:55PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 03:11:45PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > What impact is this going to have on ports? Surely there are lots of > > > them that use putenv(). > > > > If they work under Linux, they already forced to do the right thing. Only > > those which are BSD-only may fail. > > > > > Can I assume you're interested in fixing them? > > > > Yes. > > Great, thanks! Kris, could you please run test build for ports with all changes up to sys/param.h in? I want to see how many ports will failed if any. Personally me run lots of ports of my machine and didn't notice any bad side effect yet. -- http://ache.pp.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070501001627.GA804>