Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 12:53:04 -0400 From: Damian Gerow <dgerow@afflictions.org> To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: examples/etc/make.conf: nocona? Message-ID: <20050508165304.GA30948@afflictions.org> In-Reply-To: <86is1urpx8.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <20050505190812.GB15724@afflictions.org> <86is1urpx8.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Dag-Erling Smørgrav (des@des.no) [08/05/05 11:08]: : Damian Gerow <dgerow@afflictions.org> writes: : > I can understand listing nocona under AMD64 architecture, but isn't it an : > Intel CPU? Am I missing something in thinking it should be listed under : > "Intel CPUs"? : : Correct. I pointed this out when the commit was made, but apparently : noone listened. Ack. I just noticed that 'pentiumpro' is also mis-spelled 'penitumpro' as well... PR time, I think.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050508165304.GA30948>