Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 11:52:30 +0000 From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: des@ofug.org Cc: Ed Alley <wea@llnl.gov>, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/47982: Response to Dag-Erling Message-ID: <20030318115230.GA58683@walton.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: <xzpn0js3ogm.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <200303172340.h2HNeD0R001479@freefall.freebsd.org> <xzpn0js3ogm.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 12:26:33PM +0100, des@ofug.org wrote: > > The VFS/VNODE interface changes from RELEASE to > > RELEASE. > > That is simply not true. I guess Ed is working from the point of view of having updated his filesystem code from 4.X to 5.X, which would have involved more significant VFS/VNODE changes. So, his statement would be true from release series to release series, but I suspect Ed is not as familiar with FreeBSD jargon as you. > The authoritative text on submitting FreeBSD problem reports is: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/problem-reports/ > > If you'd read it, you'd at least know the proper way to attach a patch > to a PR. I believe I was the one who told Ed to submit his patch as a follow up, which in retrospect probably wasn't a very good idea. I'll see if I can help Ed getting his code into either ports or src/sys as seems most appropriate. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030318115230.GA58683>