Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:17:47 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Peter Ulrich Kruppa <ulrich@pukruppa.de>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why Clang
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201416540.24484@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <4FE1BD0E.5060300@pukruppa.de>
References:  <4FCF9333.70201@speakeasy.org> <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <CAH3a3KWKNF5Bt-8=KgtbMh=rV6GfUO7OaeE6-SutxkcRe8cG3Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191953280.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20120619205225.21d6709f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20f61898ce668c96f8882981cf8e24f6@remailer.privacy.at> <4FE1AD27.8000704@gmail.com> <CAH3a3KWHYC%2BpbkdQWF4Pfqv=W0Ldzo8q4T8Ta5wgsryocxNFuA@mail.gmail.com> <1340192731894-5720039.post@n5.nabble.com> <4FE1BD0E.5060300@pukruppa.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Nothing wrong with productive flaming for me,
>> but it's just not typical code of conduct in FreeBSD
>> mailing list at all.
> Actually I can't remember any flame-war about system compilers - this is the 
> first one.

because such situation like now never happened - changing C compiler to 
much worse because of political reasons.

> But I believe it is a good proof, that clang is a serious alternative to gcc 
it is only a proof that it was decided to put it as FreeBSD default 
compiler.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201416540.24484>