Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:30:42 -0400 From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@freebsd.org> To: "Christian S.J. Peron" <csjp@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys proc.h src/sys/kern kern_exec.c kern_thread.c Message-ID: <20041006153042.GI47017@green.homeunix.org> In-Reply-To: <20041006151749.GA56513@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200410060040.i960efqj089441@repoman.freebsd.org> <20041006151749.GA56513@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 03:17:49PM +0000, Christian S.J. Peron wrote: > On 6 Oct 2004 David Xu wrote: > > davidxu 2004-10-06 00:40:41 UTC > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > sys/sys proc.h > > sys/kern kern_exec.c kern_thread.c > > Log: > > In original kern_execve() code, at the start of the function, it forces > > all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and > > a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side > > effect is unexpected. > > Should this be an MFC canidate? I think that it's fair to say every committer should to his or her capacity do a cvs diff -rRELENG_5 -rHEAD at some point, and see if they notice any changes that really should be merged, and haven't been. So even though I don't really put "MFC" in any of my recent commits, it's fair to say I'm going to review them again and decide which ones should probably be MFCed. -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041006153042.GI47017>