Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:47:01 -0800 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org> To: Takahashi Yoshihiro <nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes/common new.sgml Message-ID: <1109011621.21445.13.camel@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> In-Reply-To: <20050221.210640.74677258.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org> References: <200502192010.j1JKAcCQ053095@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050221.210640.74677258.nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-SipUMSJkP7ibue6syopP Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If memory serves me right, Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote: > In article <200502192010.j1JKAcCQ053095@repoman.freebsd.org> > "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.org> writes: >=20 > > bmah 2005-02-19 20:10:38 UTC > >=20 > > FreeBSD src repository > >=20 > > Modified files: > > release/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/relnotes/common new.sgml=20 > > Log: > > New release notes: OLDCARD removed, ath(4) transmit rate control > > modules, wlan(4) overhaul with particular mention of the wlan_wep > > module, amr(4) PAE-safe (+MFC), matcd(4) removed, wd(4) removed for > > pc98, ifconfig(8) reorg and update. >=20 > PC98 still uses the OLDCARD. I didn't know that, but the OLDCARD note is marked only for i386 (not pc98). Is that OK, or should I be more explicit? Thanks, Bruce. --=-SipUMSJkP7ibue6syopP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCGiyl2MoxcVugUsMRAkScAJ9yJc8mWAmU2kKQJ0yNSFVAmqRnMwCgok24 c5xG/Vy+2ICcD0USvsEU3qU= =b+sP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-SipUMSJkP7ibue6syopP--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1109011621.21445.13.camel>